The Impact on America of Turkish, Greek and Italian Immigrants and Thei

The Impact on America of Turkish, Greek and Italian Immigrants and Their Respective Cultures My Big Fat Greek Wedding, The Godfather, The Italian Job, Roberto Benigni, Mario Andretti, Frank Capra, spaghetti, gelato, Turkish baths.? What do all of these have in common All of them are well known parts of American culture, yet they have all been influenced and inspired by Italian, Greek, and Turkish immigrants and their respective cultures.? Because America is a melting pot of cultures, it is understandable that each participating culture brings its own unique flavor to the mix.? Three of the most evident portions of American society, entertainment, food, and religion are also probably the three portions most affected by the infusion of new immigrants and culture.? This influence is especially evident when the immigrants concerned hail from the countries of Turkey, Italy, and Greece.? Their impact is wide reaching and long-lasting. My Big Fat Greek Wedding was the fifth highest grossing movie in the US in 2002, and is the highest grossing independent movie ever.? The only movies that brought in more money were all special effects intensive such as Spider-Man, The Lord of The Rings:? The Two Towers, and Star Wars:? Episode Two.? My Big Fat Greek Wedding instead focused on the simple story of a Greek woman falling in love with a non-Greek man and the way in which they attempt to blend their very different backgrounds.? Nia Vardalos, the writer and star of the movie, is the descendent of Greek immigrants and clearly applied her own cultural background and experience to the movie. Audiences learned how most Greek children in America attend Greek school, Greek families are very close, and that there is an expectation f... ... immigrants as well as subsequent generations.? The traditions of various cultures, especially Italian, Greek, and Turkish cultures are evident in the history of the American movie.? Our diet is also largely comprised of ethnic foods, particularly Italian.? The various places of worship available to parishioners also exemplify the impact of immigrants.? Without the countless interactions between varying cultures, America would not be the multi-faceted country that it is.? America truly is a melting pot of countries, and as each of these countries continue to contribute aspects of their culture, the diversity and uniqueness of America will continue to increase. Works Cited: http://www.immigrationforum.org/pubs/articles/immigrantsinnews2001.htm http://www.imdb.com http://www.turkish-delight.com/ Buscaglia, Leo. Papa, My Father. New Jersey: SLACK, 1989.

Globalization and Sustainability: The Importance of Government

The world was once vast and unknown. Communication was once dreaded as messages would take exceeded amounts of time from one point of destination to the next. Countries would not know of each other†s affairs for months because the world was large beyond anyone†s imagination. But as soon as technology reared its head the world rapidly became smaller. It modified everything within its grasp. Communication that once took months could now take seconds. Travelling abroad that would have taken years now took hours. Every institution that fell into this form of globalisation changed. It is obvious to see that governments have also been effected by globalisation in such ways that they can either imitate or contrast with each other. Yet a controversy exists about the issue on the effect of globalisation on governmental power. On one side of the argument globalisation is considered as a force that weakens the power of government whereas others debate the contrary, claiming that there is no effect and power remains constant. Still both arguments fail because of the extremity that they impose. A better argument would be that globalisation does effect government power, not to the point of weakening, but ensuring that no abuse of power occurs unknowingly. Globalisation is simply a tool that enables the actions of governments to be monitored by other countries and world organisations. With comparison of Australian and Canadian environmental policy, it will be clear that actions taken by the government have been influenced (not controlled) by globalisation. The idea of the world becoming a small interactive village is what many would consider the effect of globalisation. Boundaries are no longer an issue and can be crossed with an easy click of the mouse. But globalisation is far from being a new concept that came along with technology. It has existed since humans have had curiosity. The exploring of new lands, the discovery of new peoples and nations, to the fascination of nature†s physical features, people have been in the process of globalisation for centuries. Technology had simply allowed globalisation to progress a little more rapidly than what it had accomplished in the past. Although it seems that globalisation brings promise of a unified Utopian society this is far from becoming the truth. Today†s world is based on the market. The selling of goods and services to the consumer to gain profit. Therefore globalisation has become the expansion of the market place with greater opportunities for production and trade in new locations. 1 Relations are established between nations, not for the mere satisfaction of peace, but for the insurance that a trading partner exists where profit can be gained. This motivation from profit leads to the element of the manufacturing process. In order to achieve maximum profit corporations need to spend less in producing a product. They go about this through means of cheap energy fuel (usually fossil fuels like coal), low labour wages, and cutting costs in waste disposal. For an exceeded amount of time corporations have been able to escape the clutches of the law because it was seen that damage to the environment was a small price to pay in exchange for high profits. For instance abuse to the Canadian forests in the past two centuries has led to a large proportion of it being cut, 8 000 kilometres long and hundreds of kilometres wide. When large damage has been inflicted only then will people†s concerns be aroused. Governments then needed to intervene, to steer corporations from inflicting anymore damage to resources and environment. Canadian government had only made environmental policy a main concern since 1985. It was in the Ontario provincial election where pollution was made a significant issue. This was the first time ever that the issue of pollution was made a priority. Ever since the topic of concern for pollution has been maintained by both provincial and federal institutions. Australia on the other hand began its involvement on the issue in 1980. It was in this year that the World Conservation Strategy was published and the country took it upon itself to formulate a similar document that would help enforce the idea of sustainable environment throughout the nation. 4 Although government intervention seems to guarantee some progress towards sustainability the idea of globalisation alters the desired effects. World trade allows the cheapest producer to gain maximum profits. Competition for profits is then always present. In order for competition to exist all producers must somehow keep product costs low while maintaining or increasing product output. If legislation is passed within a country that holds a corporation responsible for destruction to the environment by means of their waste, corporations can still outrun any consequences from their actions. It is difficult to prosecute institutions because they are essential. 5 They provide jobs, goods and services, and distribute money towards many organisations. The industry allows economy to prosper as well as many citizens that partake in the production and consumption of the goods. The destruction of the environment is seen as irrelevant to the benefits of cash profit that the industry brings. What corporations fail to observe is the future outlook. The concern is only on maximum exploitation for maximum gain. No corporation has interest in conservation because of the mentality of whatever is left by a corporation will simply be used by a competitor. 6 Yet the immediate gains will not always be present because sooner or later resources will be exhausted and there will then be a failure to produce, soon followed by a collapse within the industry production and profit. Sustainability will ensure that resources can be reserved as well as allowing time for some replenishment. It is for this reason that governments have decided to be involved, for a fall in industry would lead to a fall in the economy and the welfare of the state. Canada and Australia share the same vision when it comes to sustainability. Both understand that environmental policy is essential to maintain a prosperous nation. There has been a similar vision on the purpose of developing environmental policy. The development is to allow (i) multiple times scales in which the present is considered as well as the near and farther future; (ii) effect on various dimensions of social life where economy, environment, and social equity are viewed as equal; and (iii) diverse social and ecological scales where region and locality are a concern as well as the global nation. 7 All three aspects are to produce an ecologically balanced society, with stable institutions designed to assure equilibrium within tolerances that the natural environment can support. This is much easier said than done. The event of there being total agreement is never achieved and compromising always leads to one or all parties involved to be unsatisfied. In order to satisfy government policy, as well as avoid negative outbreaks by environmental conscience citizens, corporations need to follow the specified guidelines of environmental sustainability. Institutions then need to pay much more attention and effort towards waste elimination and treatment. This costs a substantial amount of money. Two options are to either increase product prices or cut spending on other operations within the process. Increasing prices would allow costs to be covered and avoid in any profit loss experienced by the corporation but high prices could cause for decrease in profit for it causes a decrease in profits by the lower prices This again is a of current competitors. This is the reason why the second option is more favourable. Cutting costs in the operation allows for the same amount to be spent on production and in some instances even less. Most popular method of cutting is within the removal of management layers. By eliminating certain amounts of staff and replacing them with computers and automation manufacturing processes companies can then compete in the world market. 9 This occurs mostly in wealthy nations such as Canada, Australia, England, and the United States. Since poor nations have no strict policies on labour leading to low wage structures, production by corporations within these nations can produce product cheaply and sell at an admirably low price. Since wealthy nations have high labour costs, expensive social programs, and a high degree of foreign investment, in order to compete in the world market they choose to employ less. 11 It seems to be a simple enough tactic but other corporations have been so used to a certain process of production that instead of changing their methods they would rather relocate to poorer nations in which they could keep profits or exceed them tenfold. Globalisation leads to the reallocation of corporations. In less hostile environments, these corporate conglomerates can destroy and manipulate the environment to their pleasing and will not be accused for they supply many jobs in a poor nation that needs income to fuel its economy. This global mobility allows corporations to escape environmental policy. The acceleration of jobless growth in poor nations leads to unemployment, creating pressures that allow economic activity that is destructive as well as it undermines efforts of mitigation, planning, and regulatory enforcement. 2 Environmental policy with absence of enforcement leads to the lack of interest in enforcement. The NAFTA agreement, the elimination of tariffs among trading countries, between the United States, Canada, and the developing Mexico is a good example of how businesses escape strict policy. Because of Mexico†s low wage enforcement and anti-union government, environmental policy falls prey to lower standards and enforcement. 13 The nation really does feel opposed to the destruction but if they fail to allow industries to do so they will lose business to global mobility. The problem is does not lie on government passing legislation for policies have been made. The problem lies within the amount of enforcement that is dedicated on ensuring that the policies are practised to the full extent. Not every country has the same view when enforcement of policy is the issue. Some nations are better off than others so it is easier for them to proceed with strict enforcement but Third World countries, in order to compete in the world market, are more lenient because of the need to better establish a prosperous economy. This is a main concern among many because the problem is never fully solved but simply reallocated. This is when international policy becomes a suggested solution. Governments need to strike a common chord with each other when it comes to environmental sustainability. It needs to be seen that if restrictions are present and enforced equally throughout all nations then the concept of conservation will be spread throughout globally. In order for this to succeed a new flow of financing and technology for environmental conservation needs to be achieved. Third World nations would also not feel the pressure to exploit for maximum profit if debts were alleviated and industrial countries initiated programs to provide access to technical assistance, training technology transfer, and planning grants to increase their capacity to manage environmental and energy challenges. 15 Through this method it would allow nations to stand on equal ground and be able to maintain a harmony between nature and industry. This is a fantasy to be achieved for the motive of wealth is always the motivation that leads to the neglecting of policies. The proposal of a world government is an idea that could ensure that a universal policy be followed by all countries and ensure that enforcement be weighted equally among all nations. A world government generates both relief and fear when it boils down to policy making. The relief comes that all nations are treated equally and must follow all laws that have been passed by this supreme institution. Yet, not all nations are equal even though the idea of it sounds appealing. Some nations are better off than others are so it is difficult for everyone to participate fully when some nations can achieve goals easier than others can. The main fear springs from the idea of losing identity and power. A single government representing the world of many different cultures and beliefs is very hard to imagine. Minorities might feel threatened in that they have no legitimate say in the outcomes of producing legislation. This in turn leads to the representation of governments in countries. They would feel threatened in the sense that they truly have no power since the world government would be the one in control of matters of all countries globally. So, what needs to be done is not the production of a world government but an alliance between world organisations and existing governments. Globalisation through this method does not infringe on the power of government but allows for compromise to occur and for then to understand the need for a unified co-operation to maintain the environment and resources for future enjoyment and use. In Australia for instance, the Confederation of Australian Industry and the Australian Conservation Foundation, along side with a number of state governments, agreed to endorse the National Conservation Strategy for Australia in 1986. This promoted the need to save the environment and ecological beauty of Australia for there was a realisation that damage to the environment would lead to damage to the economy. The concern was in tourism. The natural environment is a critically important part of tourism and is increasingly being recognised as such through the term â€Å"Ecotourism†. 17 Through globalisation and government assistance it is possible to see the importance of conservation which in turn would set precedence for other countries to follow. This was the main intention by the Australian Tourism Industry Association who argued that tourism can and does (i) enhance environmental appreciation by changing people†s attitudes; (ii) act as a justification for environmental conservation; (iii) enhance environmental management for conservation; and (iv) enrich the social and cultural environment of the Australian community. 18 A global government may have a unilateral authority and may think broadly but it can not possibly reach out to everyone†s interests in the decision making. Mutual adjustment is the best method to solving the environmental problem by the use of global co-ordination. When this occurs it produces policies and plans that take account many positions that exist. A country†s own government needs to be aware of the essential needs of its people and must respond to the concerns of various authorities of energy, roads and highways, land use, city planning, air and rail transport, and industrial policy. 20 These needs then need to co-relate with those needs presented by organisations that stand for the protection of the planets resources and environment. Governments have not lost power but need to re-learn how to distribute their influence. Both the federal and provincial governments, at least in Canada, hold the distribution of authority over environmental policy. The municipal governments still participate even though they have been given no authority over the matter. 21 But the majority of the work is achieved by organisations that press governments for swifter actions towards policy making. In Canada, the Greenpeace group, located in Vancouver and Toronto, had a revenue of 7. 4 million dollars without government or corporal aid from 1987 to 1990. The source of revenue came from concerned individuals within the country who see the needed value of conserving the planet. In response, political parties must address these issues to ensure that the public receives the results that they desire. When the creation of the National Conservation Strategy in Australia took place both the Fraser Liberal government and the Hawke Labour government played an important role in the structure that the policy was comprised of. 23 Through globalisation the world can look upon itself and see that there are better methods of approaching problems. Profit can not constantly exist if there is no planet to work from. The governments see this and pressure each other to abide by a universal understanding that there is a great need for sustainability. Powers are not decreased or removed but simply placed into a different context where instead of the individual gain the overall gain should have more precedence. Both Canada and Australia have set example that industry and environment can exist together and it is the governments duty to ensure that guidelines are set to allow enforcement take place. Globalisation can help environmental policy only if other countries have full understanding of the benefits and participate with means of improvement. The poorer nations need to be guided by the wealthy to prevent any further destruction on the remaining resources that the planet contains. Global understanding and consensus will allow for countries to maintain their distinctiveness but allow for one common trait to exist, a total appreciation of the shared home we call earth.

Professional Practice - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 8 Words: 2358 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Law Essay Type Research paper Level High school Tags: Tort Essay Did you like this example? Professional Practice Case Law Report Table of Contents Case description 3 Images related to the case Material facts of the case 4 Explanation of the legal areas outlined in the judgment 5 Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Professional Practice" essay for you Create order Tort Law Overview Negligence Nuisance (Private and Public) Duty of Care Analysis of the decision 7 In the case of Negligence In the case of Duty of Care In the case of Nuisance Reflective learning 8 Bibliography 9 Case Description THE HIGH COURT ON CIRCUIT Record Number: 998/03 SOUTH EASTERN CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WATERFORD Plaintiffs : Oliver Dempsey and Elizabeth Dempsey Defendant : Waterford Corporation Judgement Title : Dempsey Anor à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å"v- Waterford Corporation Neutral Citation : [2008] IEHC 55 High Court Record Number: Circuit Court 998/03 Judgment by: Peart J. Composition of Court: Peart J. Images related to the case (www.google.ie/maps) (www.google.ie/maps) Grattan Quay street view Dyehouse lane street view (www.osi.ie) (www.osi.ie) Grattan Quay OSI map Dyehouse lane OSI map Material Facts of the Case In the case of Dempsey Anor- v- Waterford Corporation [2008] IEHC 55 (29 February 2008) the first material fact presented is that the plaintiffs purchased the house in 1984which they then restored and renovated. On the 3rd of March 2000, the plaintiffs discovered that the floor which was laid in the plaintiffsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ living room had buckled without any warning and noxious smell had developed in the room. Following this discovery by the plaintiffs a dye test inspection was carried out by Mr Chris O Sullivan which involved running a dye through the pipes in the street to see if any dye entered the living room of the plaintiff. Thereafter the plaintiffs à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"excavated their floor which revealed old 17th century drains. A fter further investigation it was revealed that the pipes went out of the house and also that the pipe was badly blocked A fact of central importance was noted that the defendant carried out major sewer renewal works on the main sewer and branch pipes on Grattan Quay. One of these branch pipes was located on Dyehouse Street and this pipe was previously inspected using the dye test as mentioned earlier. Mr O Sullivan stated that the defendant was unaware of these drains as they did not appear on maps or records leading to the defendant denying any negligence or fault in his case. Furthermore the defendant claims that the plaintiff should have complied with building regulations and should have applied vertical damp proof course which would have joined the vertical damp proof course thus preventing any moisture or dampness. The plaintiffs in turn argued that the building regulations only applied to new houses and also that since there were no previous issues since 1984 there was no need.[1] Tort Law Overview With there being such vast amounts of information from various sources regarding Tort Law it is difficult to produce a description of what Tort Law actually is. Tort Law generally covers a broad variety of most civil lawsuits apart from contractual disputes. It is used mostly to redress an issue where a person has been wrong done. Torts can be broken down into three general Torts Negligent torts Intentional torts Strict liability Although Tort can be broken into the three categories listed above there are other areas which fall under Tort Law including Nuisance, defamation and invasion of privacy.[2] Negligence Tort of Negligence falls under three main factors to do with careless infliction of damage or harm which are (a) the existence of legal duty of care (b) a breach of that duty of and (c) consequential damage[3]. Negligence in simpler terms is a personà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s failure to behave with the same level of cautiousness shown under the same circumstances or in the same situation. This behaviour can be classed as personà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s actions or equally there inactions. To further help in explaining Negligent Torts or a case of negligence where duty of care comes into play referring to the case of Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562, Lord Atkinà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s description of the general concept of the duty of care breaks it down further[4] à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"The rule that you are to love your neighbour becomes in law, you must not injure your neighbour: and the lawyerà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s question who is my neighbour? receives a restricted reply. You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour? The answer seems to be persons who are closely affected by my act that I ought reasonably to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called into questionà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢[5] Although Lord Atkinà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"neighbour principleà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ received criticism for being too broad it was eventually accepted and to this day it is generally used in understanding the tort of negligence. It has been emphasised on a number of occasions that negligence comes down to a fault based liability and in turn there must be some degree of fault on the part of the defendant. The existence of legal duty of care ca n also be defined as a personà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s failure to ensure adequate level of care in a situation that could potentially be harmful to another person as for a breach of that duty. Donoghue v Stevenson is a good example as it was the manufacturers duty of care to ensure the product was fit for human consumption and when it was proven to not be fit this was a breach of that duty of care. Consequential damage is then defined by an injury or harm which may not have been sustained directly from such an act but rather in consequence of the act in question[6] Nuisance (Private and Public) Where Nuisance is concerned in the area of tort law is ità ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s widely divided into two torts the first being private nuisance and the second being public nuisance. In other words private nuisance is solely concerned with the individual whereas public nuisance concerns issues regarding the general public or a group. Private Nuisance When considering private nuisance there a re certain actions which are categorised as a private nuisance such as interfering with a personà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s land or even with the general enjoyment of the land in question. Basically a private nuisance is comprised of a person committing an act which is not contained within his/her own land and which is directly interfering or affecting another personà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s land. For a case to be private nuisance it doesnà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢t just fall under interference or encroachment there are also cases where if such an interference caused damage to a personà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s employment of his property this would also be considered private nuisance. In order to the accountability for a case of private nuisance there are three main factors which will be taken into account a) the defendants fault b) whether there has been substantial interference with the plaintiffs interest and c) the reasonableness of the defendants conduct. Public Nuisance In regards to public nuisance it is best defined as the protection of the public unlike private which is individual. Public nuisance which also falls under tort law is in certain cases classed as a crime it is any omission or act which in turn affects the comfort, convince, health or safety of a group people or the general public. It only becomes an offense and can be actionable if a single person is foreseeably more affected than anyone other person within the group or if such person feels as though a private right has been interfered with through this act/omission. A simple example of a public nuisance would be the sale of food/beverages that are not fit for human consumption or causing a hazardous obstruction on a main road which could potentially cause harm to the public.[7] Duty of Care Duty of care is defined as an obligation that a person or persons in a position of care act and behave with an adequate degree of cautiousness, watchfulness and attention in the same scenario as would a à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å "reasonable personà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢. For example if a designer carried out works which were to an adequate standard which reached the same standard as a reasonably competent designer within his discipline then he would not be considered negligent and would have maintained his duty of care. On the other hand this failure to comply with regulations may lead to potential damage to property.[8] Analysis of the Decision In the Case of Negligence In analysing the decision of the case Dempsey Anor-v- Waterford Corporation [2008] IEHC 55 It is important to understand that negligence focuses on careless of the defendant and asks the question of asks the question whether or not the defendant should have foreseen that his/her negligence would directly relate to any damages/injury to the plaintiffs. [9] In this case the fact that the drains where not documented on any maps or other sources it would have been foolish to say that the defendant could have foreseen that the pipes coul d have led to the cause of the damage sustained in the plaintiffs living room given that there is to this day no evidence/records documenting these pipes nor their exact location. To establish liability/negligence it is required to find a legal responsibility on the defendant in terms of an obligation of duty. The fact that the pipes where never previously identified it is difficult to decide whether or not the defendant failed to take reasonable care in ensuring not to damage the plaintiffs property given there was no prior knowledge of such pipes. On the other hand thereà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s no question that the defendant had a duty of care not to damage the plaintiffs property but the fact the pipes where non-existent realistically the defendants did not break their duty of care and cannot be considered negligent. In the case of Duty of Care In terms of duty of care there is no doubt that the defendants had a duty of care to uphold but it is difficult to establish whether or not there duty of care extended as far as having knowledge of such pipes and if these pipes could have potentially caused damage to the plaintiffs property. The fact that the only way these pipes could have been discovered before the damage occurred in the plaintiffà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s property would have been to excavate the majority of Grattan Quay and given there was no prior knowledge of the pipes there wouldnà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢t have been any justified cause which would have enticed the defendant to carry out such exploratory work in search of something which in their minds never existed. Therefore again it comes to down to the fact that the defendants had no prior knowledge of such pipes and therefore the evidence suggests that the defendants did not breach their duty of care and therefore can again not be considered negligent. In the case of Nuisance Finally the claim that the defendant committed a nuisance which lead to the damage sustained within the plaintiffs livin g room comes down to that the defendants where carrying out a statutory function regarding the works on Grattan Quay and therefore should held accountable in the case of committing a nuisance. With the issue of foreseeability arising again with there being no previous knowledge of the pipes by the council and no realistic reasons why the defendants would consider digging up Grattan Quay based of a à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Sure youà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢d never knowà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ basis and in light of this un-foreseeability on the councils part and the fact that thereà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s no substantial evidence to support the claim that the council where to blame for the ingress of water in the plaintiffs living room they are therefore not considered to negligent and in turn have not committed an act of nuisance. Reflective learning Throughout this assignment I have learned various skills which will be of benefit in many situations in the future. I feel as though I have established the abi lity to look back over an experience and highlight significant aspects which in this case, affected the decision and outcome. I feel as though my general understanding on how to correctly reference a case, use footnotes as a reference tool and how to properly construct a bibliography. Lastly as a whole my general grammar in my opinion has improved due to the cautiousness of how I structured my essay. Overall I felt this assignment benefited me in many areas and hopefully this experience will stand to me in the future. Bibliography Textbooks Connolly, U and Quinlivan, S. (2006). Negligence. In: Connolly, U and Quinlivan, S Tort Cases and Materials. 4th ed. Dublin: Thomson Round Hall. p29, p41. Speaight, A Stone, G. (1996). The English Law of Tort. In: Speaight, A Stone, G Architects Legal Handbook. 6th ed. Great Britain: Reed Educational Professional Publishing Ltd 1996. p17-23. Websites Bailii.org. (2008). Dempsey Anor -v- Waterford Corporation [2008] IEHC 55 (29 February 2008). Available: https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ie/cases/IEHC/2008/H55.htmlquery=Dempseymethod=boolean. Last accessed 5th March 2014. Cornell University Law School. (N/A). Negligence. Available: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/negligence. Last accessed 5th March 2014. Farlex. (2008). Nuisance. Available: https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/nuisance. Last accessed 5th March 2014. Griffith College Dublin. (2009/2010). Negligence General principles (1). Available: https://www.gcd.ie/assets/Uploads/images/Law/fe1manuals/20090519051807Chapter02Tort.pdf. Last accessed 5th March2014. Report/Journal Smith, H. (2011). Construction dispute avoidance newsletter. Available: https://www.herbertsmithfreehills.com/-/media/HS/T21121146.pdf. Last accessed 5th March 2014 Table of Cases à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" Dempsey Anor -v- Waterford Corporation [2008] IEHC 55 (29 February 2008) Cite as: [2008] IEHC 55 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932]AC 562 Rylands v Fletcher [1866] LR 1 Ex 265 at 279 [1] Dempsey Anor- v- Waterford Corporation [2008] IEHC 55 [2] Three general torts, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/tort, Legal Information Institute [3] Architects Legal Handbook, Chapter 3, The English Law of Tort, Negligence [4] Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 [5] Architects Legal Handbook, Chapter 3, The English Law of Tort, The Legal Duty of Care, Lord Atkins à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Neighbour principle à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å" Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 [6] Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 [7] Public nuisance, https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/482431/public-nuisance [8] Construction dispute avoidance newsletter https://www.herbertsmithfreehills.com/-/media/HS/T21121146.pdf [9] Dempsey Anor- v- Waterford Corporation [2008] IEHC 55